
Systems Engineers & Architects
Systems Engineers and Architects
Systems engineering is undervalued until something goes wrong at integration. We staff the people who prevent that.
What they do
Requirements Definition, HSI Specification, and Integration Strategy
Systems engineers at Game 7 own the interface specifications that prevent RTL and firmware teams from building against different interpretations of the same register spec. On safety-critical programs, they own the safety case. Explaining to certification bodies why the architecture is safe by design.
They work across semiconductor, aerospace, defense, industrial, and automotive programs, with MBSE depth using Cameo, Rhapsody, and Capella.
Scope of work
- System requirements definition and management (IBM DOORS Next, JAMA, Polarion)
- Hardware-software interface (HSI) specification: register maps, interrupt architecture, and memory map definitions
- Platform architecture: processor selection, memory hierarchy, power domain strategy, and bus topology
- Functional safety requirements allocation (ISO 26262, IEC 61508, DO-254/DO-178C)
- Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) using SysML (Cameo, Rhapsody, Capella)
- System integration and verification planning: SIL/PIL/HIL test strategy and interface test design
- Trade study and make-vs-buy analysis for IP, subsystem, and platform decisions
- Cross-functional technical lead: bridging RTL, firmware, board, and mechanical teams to architecture decisions
Tools & Technologies
The stack our Systems Engineers actually ship in.
Program context
The Connective Tissue of Complex Programs
Systems engineering is undervalued until something goes wrong at integration. An RTL engineer and a firmware engineer working from different interpretations of the same register spec will discover the conflict during silicon bring-up. Not during design. A systems engineer defines the interface specifications that prevent that conflict. On safety-critical programs (automotive ADAS, aerospace avionics, industrial robotics), systems engineers own the safety case. They must explain, to a certification body, why the architecture is safe by design rather than by coincidence.
FAQ
Common Questions on Systems Engineers & Architects Staffing
What does a systems architect own that a chip architect doesn't?+
A chip architect defines the microarchitecture of the SoC. Bus topology, memory hierarchy, power domains. A systems architect operates at the product level: how does the SoC interact with the board? What firmware runs first and why? Which functions are hardware, which are software, and what is the interface between them? What are the end-to-end latency and power budgets? A chip can be architecturally sound and still fail at the system level if the hardware-software interfaces are poorly defined. Systems architects prevent that by owning the HSI documentation.
When should a program hire a systems engineer versus a software architect?+
Systems engineers think in terms of requirements, interfaces, and behavior. Independent of implementation. Software architects think in terms of code structure, APIs, and runtime behavior. For programs where hardware and software co-design is complex. Custom SoC bring-up, ADAS platform development, aerospace avionics. A systems engineer is the right hire to own interface definitions, hardware/software requirements allocation, and the integration verification strategy. A software architect is the right hire once the platform is defined and the team needs to design the software stack above it.
What is Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and when does it apply?+
MBSE replaces document-centric systems engineering with model-centric approaches. Using SysML to represent system structure, behavior, and requirements in a connected, queryable model rather than a pile of Word documents. Defense and aerospace programs increasingly require MBSE, and automotive programs running ISO 26262 processes often use it. In practice, MBSE reduces the inconsistency between requirements, architecture, and verification that accumulates over a multi-year program. Engineers with Cameo, Rhapsody, or Capella experience are in high demand on DoD and prime contractor programs.
Can Game 7 staff systems engineers for short-term integration phases specifically?+
Yes. Systems engineering is often needed most at two points: the beginning of a program (requirements and architecture) and integration (when subsystems first come together and interfaces need to be debugged). Short-term engagements at integration. 3 to 6 months. Are common for programs that have internal systems capability for day-to-day work but need a senior architect to lead the integration phase. We have staffed this model on both semiconductor and defense programs.
Related disciplines
Cross-Links Across the Team
SystemVerilog RTL Designers with Tape-Out Experience
SoC front-end engineers who implement what the systems architect specifies.
Embedded & Firmware Engineers →RTOS and Firmware Engineers for Connected Hardware
Software teams whose work is constrained by the HSI specification.
BSP & Platform Software →BSP, Bootloader, and Platform Software Engineers
Platform engineers who bring up the architecture.
Let's talk
Need a Systems Engineer?
Tell us the program. We'll send a shortlist of 2-4 qualified engineers within days.

